Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
European Journal of Mineralogy; June 2008; v. 20; no. 3; p. 395-413; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2008/0020-1813
© 2008 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pechnikov, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaminsky, F. V.

Diamonds: A Special Issue in honour of Vladimir S. Sobolev

Diamond potential of metamorphic rocks in the Kokchetav Massif, northern Kazakhstan

Victor A. Pechnikov1 and Felix V. Kaminsky2,*

1 Central Research Institute of Geological Prospecting for Base and Precious Metals (TsNIGRI), Varshavskoe shosse 129-1, Moscow 117545, Russia
2 KM Diamond Exploration Ltd., 2446 Shadbolt Lane, West Vancouver, BC. V7S 3J1, Canada

* Corresponding author, e-mail: felixvkaminsky{at}cs.com

There are two known diamondiferous bodies in Kazakhstan, the Kumdy-Kol deposit and the Barchi-Kol occurrence. Both are located within the western part of a metamorphic belt that outcrops at the central part of the Kokchetav Massif. The metamorphic belt is interpreted as a mega-mélange that comprises structural units underlain by HP and UHP rocks. Diamondiferous varieties of the UHP rocks within the Kumdy-Kol deposit form a narrow (~1 km thick), NE-trending band; they comprise less than one percent of the total UHP rock volume. The economically important diamondiferous zone consists of variegated rocks, from silicate to essentially carbonate varieties with a wide spectrum of mineral assemblages. Garnet-biotite gneiss makes about 80 % of the diamondiferous zone. Certain regularity is discernable in spatial distribution of diamonds: linear diamond-rich zones alternate with barren ones. The diamond grade ranges from several carats per ton (cpt) to several hundreds cpt. Different morphological varieties are present among the diamonds: octahedra, cubes, cube-octahedron combination forms, skeletal and spheroid crystals. A wide range of {delta}13C (–8.9{per thousand} through –27 {per thousand}) and {delta}15N (+5.3 {per thousand} through +25 {per thousand}) values have been measured. Diamonds from different rock types differ in their carbon isotopic pattern: diamonds from gneiss have ‘lighter’ isotopic compositions relative to those of pyroxene-carbonate and garnet-pyroxene rocks. Graphite, coesite, clinopyroxene, rutile, titanite, kyanite, K-feldspar, biotite, phengite, quartz, phlogopite, albite, apatite, chlorite and carbonates are minerals forming intergrowths with diamonds. The most frequent combination is graphite +diamond. We conclude that the model of crustal fluid-metasomatic formation of diamonds in metamorphic rocks reflects the observed regularities best. The morphology of diamondiferous bodies favors the notion of their formation from a carbon-bearing fluid. The micrometer size of the diamonds, along with isotopic signatures, hint at their formation under metastable crustal conditions. This model presumes that the formative process occurred at relatively low temperature and pressure within an open disequilibrium catalytic system. It does not exclude an UHP episode in the geological history of the metamorphic rocks.

Key-words: diamond, Kazakhstan, metamorphism, genesis, carbon.






JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers